This section describes the implementation of the material model for
steel relaxation given in Eurocode 2 (the same as in Model Code 2010)
and in Bazant and Yu (J. of Eng. Mech, 2013) which reduces to the first model under
constant strain. At variable strain history the first model uses the
approach employing the so-called equivalent time approach
described in Annex D in the Eurocode 2.
The current implementation takes into account only prestress losses
due to steel relaxation, other losses (e.g. slip at anchorage,
thermal dilation, friction, etc.) need to be treated separately. The same holds
for the stress transfer from prestressing reinforcement to concrete in
the region called transmission length. On the other hand,
losses due to sequential prestressing, elastic deformation and both
short-time and long-time creep and shrinkage are taken into account
automatically provided that a suitable material model is chosen for
concrete.
In the first approach the stress on the end of the time step is
explicitly given by the current stress, prestressing level and the
cumulative value of prestress losses. On the other hand, in
Bazant's approach it is necessary to iterate on the material point
level in order to reach equilibrium.
As a simplification the stress-strain diagram is in the current
implementation assumed to be
linear (no yielding), this should be sufficient for most cases.
Under a constant strain, the evolution of prestress loss is defined as
|
|
|
(234) |
where
is the initial value of prestress reduced for
losses during prestressing, is time after prestressing in
hours,
, is the
characteristic strength of prestressing steel in tension, and finally
, , and
are material parameters determined by
the relaxation properties of the reinforcement.
For wires or cables with normal relaxation (class 1)
,
and
, for cables or wires with
reduced relaxation (class 2)
,
and
, and for hot-rolled
and modified rods (class 3)
, and
.
The prestress
is not specified in the input record. It
is initialized automatically at the time instant when stress differs
from zero.
The material model has one internal variable which has a meaning of
cumulative prestress loss when equivalent time approach is
employed; otherwise its meaning is a cumulative strain caused by
relaxation.
Table 52:
SteelRelaxMat material model - summary.
Description |
SteelRelaxMat model for relaxation of prestressing reinforcement |
Record Format |
SteelRelaxMat
d(rn) #
E(rn) #
reinfClass(in) #
[ timeFactor(rn) #]
charStrength(rn) #
approach(in) #
[ k1(rn) #]
[ k2(rn) #]
[ rho1000(rn) #]
[ tolerance(rn) #]
[ relRelaxBound(rn) #] |
Parameters |
- num material model number |
|
- d specific weight |
|
- E Young's modulus |
|
- reinfClass class of prestressing reinforcement (1, 2, 3) |
|
- timeFactor scaling factor transforming the actual time into
appropriate units needed by the formulae of the eurocode. For analysis
in days timeFactor = 1, for analysis in seconds timeFactor = 86,400. |
|
- charStrength characteristic strength of prestressing steel
in appropriate units (not necessarily MPa) |
|
- approach 0 = approach according to Bazant and Yu, 1 =
equivalent time approach according to Eurocode 2 and fib Model Code 2010 |
|
- k1 possibility to overwrite default value given by the
reinforcement class |
|
- k2 possibility to overwrite default value given by the
reinforcement class |
|
- rho1000 possibility to overwrite default value given by the
reinforcement class |
|
- tolerance applicable only for
; tolerance
specifying the residual in the stress evaluation algorithm, default
value is |
|
- relRelaxBound ratio of stress to characteristic strength
under which the relaxation is zero (typically 0.4-0.5); default
value is zero |
Supported modes |
1dMat |
|
Borek Patzak
2019-03-19